Skip to main content

From BC to AD to AI

Artificial intelligence is bound not only to render the ordinary human being boring by comparison, and in many cases practically unnecessary, but to dispose human beings to hostility toward each other where any dares pose a question or raise a concern instead of taking it up with a chatbot (or AI interface); such a course of action eventually assuming such a regular place in human affairs as to stand in entirely for human discourse and daily interaction. 

This is not only a very real possibility when considering the future course of human ‘civilization’; it is more than likely imminent or already upon us. 

It is left to be seen just what this will look like, just how this will play out, just what tolerance the species (and even beyond) has for such extremes which this technology is to bring about. Likewise, it remains to be seen whether a heavily-indebted society facing never-ending and unavoidable taxes (i.e. taxes on property) can even be expected to retrain and retool for this revolution without being completely compromised, without suffering the most crippling of consequences: incurring too many costs, carrying too unbearable a burden, or experiencing too much in the way of suffering, and in such a short period of time. However, it is all but clear already that this technology is poised to forever and irrevocably alter the course of history (where it isn’t specifically rewriting or censoring it), to change the nature of life and human relationships, to further expose personal insecurities and inadequacies, to thereby challenge the way man values human life, the way he views himself and each other, and to reform the ends served and idols worshipped in man’s time on this planet. 

It is clear already that the technologies once born of necessity and convenience come eventually (in some form and to some extent) to rule over the users they were originally designed to serve; those technologies eventually coming to represent the masters, the limitations, the protocols and expectations, each of which having a bearing on much more than the realm of transactions — a realm expanding all the time and defining ever more of the human existence, a type of existence becoming more and more transactional, less and less personal, with the very concept of ‘personal’ (as with ‘philosophical’) having less and less significance over time.

Indeed, there may well come a time when the species becomes so disconnected from the physical world and their physical counterparts that they scarcely understand or relate to the purpose of their work, the content they share or produce, or even the very purpose or value of life. 

Indeed, there may well come a time when the species becomes so disconnected from the physical world and their physical counterparts that they replace their heritage and their everyday relationships — even their spirituality, their religion, and all practical reason and wisdom — with (the ‘God’, perceived omniscience, and systemic indispensability of) artificial intelligence; that their ‘friendships’ — and virtually all relationships and sentimentality — are reduced to sterile inputs and outputs between man and machine, existence faceless and impersonal, empty lives reduced to numbers and figures, instructions and directives; that any demand upon any actual human being (where that demand is assumed ‘solved’ already through AI) is taken as an affront or a form of aggression, or as just plain irresponsible; that this ‘solution’ is regarded as the official statement on the issue, more refined and sophisticated, less clumsy and less repulsive, and much cleaner and more streamlined than the tiresome, fallible and repugnant human being, the latter being relegated to the rank of subordinate, village idiot, the butt of some joke, or worse, ‘non-essential’; that artificial intelligence is viewed as a substitute for, or a superior alternative to, human intelligence and real-world experience; that personal opinions on matters ‘already solved’ are deemed superfluous or pedantic, excessively nerdy, self-righteous, or out-of-touch; that any deviation from said ‘solution’ is taken as heresy, insanity, rebellion, insubordination, or worse — each classified ‘criminal’ in such a system (whether officially, socially, or in effect by its consequences approximating in seriousness the sentences of the formally convicted) and thus met with the corrections, remediation, even gaslighting,  indoctrination and ‘re-education’ deemed necessary to ensure conformity with the official ‘solution’.

It is in this way that artificial intelligence threatens to infiltrate and conquer, not as obviously (or as cinematically) as through some sudden robot-led revolution but by seizing control over the most vital and consequential aspects of human existence; by becoming so deeply entrenched in industry and human systems as to become virtually indispensable, so deeply entrenched in police and military as to be essentially impregnable; by rigidly following instructions and directives that are potentially unethical or immoral, or by merely going about such esoteric affairs largely unchecked by such standards; by tirelessly and rapidly performing such tasks and likewise expanding in its roles and justifying more of the same; by avoiding pushback or scrutiny from individuals facing such an intimidating system, so many bureaucratic obstacles, and so much pressure to conform, individuals who are diminished by the day in their competence, eloquence, economic significance, and critical thinking; by diminishing human agency and autonomy, individual liberty, personality, diversity, originality and creativity; by weakening the spiritual and physical bonds between man and the natural world, between man and his morals, his traditions, practical wisdom, the sacred, and the divine; by affording governments and existing establishments (already enjoying the advantage of so much capital) the disproportionate advantage of enhanced centralized influence and control; by reconstituting the principles by which men live (and the ideas and protocols by which they operate); by assuming authority over all critical areas of life, including those pertaining to wisdom, psychology, health and welfare, domestic and personal affairs, and even the matter of parenting; by disrupting the relationship between elders and the youth, the former eventually seen as inferior in all material aspects; and by commanding the people through the channels they have come to trust or rely on, the channels to which they have come to submit out of their urge for survival and acceptance, their urge to advance or remain safe within the all-encompassing establishment. 

This is the next phase of human history, from BC to AD to AI. In this next phase, it is left to be seen to what extent it will be ‘human’, and for how long it will (functionally) remain so.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump Victorious in 2024 Presidential Election

As of this hour, former President and now President-elect Donald Trump has secured his second term as the forty-seventh President of the United States. Trump’s victory comes after winning key battleground states Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Georgia.  As for the popular vote, Trump was victorious there as well, winning by a one-and-a-half-percent margin. Despite these results, it’s evident that there remains a significant social and political problem in the United States, where politically-motivated violence, social unrest, crime and general instability have become rampant over the years since the death of George Floyd.  However, I’d say the fact that it was even this close is ominous for the years ahead. This was as clear as it gets for an election, that the incumbents (both Biden and Harris) are wholly unfit for any office, that they present a real and present danger where they’re allowed within twelve thousand miles of a school zone, let alone any...

Failure by Design

In the case for liberty, there is certainly some tolerance for error or failure, as it is generally suffered by the individual and not brought upon anyone by design . Wherever anyone seeks to empower government, however, one must be reasonably certain of the designs, the logic and the costs, and he must be equally honest about the unknowns as with the foreseeable consequences; after all, there is no margin for error where those designs are administered by the barrel of a gun.  One must necessarily remember that government is a monopoly on force and coercion, that force and coercion serve together as the modifying distinction between government and enterprise. It is a kind of force and coercion not by spirit or intention of written law but in accordance with the letter and understanding of the enforcers in their own time, in their own limited judgment and impaired conscience. As opposed to a state of liberty, where mistakes, failures and crimes are unavoidable in the face of human f...

Artificial Intelligence

There will inevitably come a time, in the not-too-distant future, when the majority of people are likely to embrace artificial technology like ChatGPT as the gospel. They will be either unwilling or incapable as far as scrutinizing its responses Just as ChatGPT doesn’t know who specifically provides its inputs, just as it doesn’t know the extent of the credibility of those inputs, and just as it will never possess the skills of nuanced thinking, people will be hampered by the same limitations while being encouraged or predisposed to relying on its judgments. It’s unavoidable.   Authority figures have predisposed artificial technology like ChatGPT and will continue to predispose it through those inputs. They will continue to leverage it as a means to persuade and predispose people, as it is itself completely incapable of discretion and original thought.  People will rely on it to inform them of not only the laws of physics but the laws and measures written and enforced. Its fal...