Skip to main content

Perspective of a "Minority" in San Francisco

The following letter was authored by a Paradocracy reader from San Francisco, California, who felt compelled to share her perspective as an immigrant, a minority and a female who's proud to be an American:

I am neither white nor black. I am a naturalized American citizen. I am a minority. I am a woman. I am not a fan of politics, and I tend to think that the little voice inside of me would be useless in the public square; but since everyone seems to have a degree in Political Science these past few weeks, and there are now so many strong supporters (bandwagoners) of all of these different social-media hashtags, I suppose I will let this little voice out of my chest. I am not looking to argue; I am just sharing my own personal feelings.

I am greatly disturbed by the craziness that is going on out there in our own community and across the country. Ever since I became a mother, I care more about life than ever. I pray that I will live until I’m 90. I want to make sure that I am present in my daughter’s life until she’s content and comfortable with her own life. I know death is inevitable, but if we can defy it by any means, then why not?

On March 16, the State of California, specifically the administrations in the San Francisco Bay Area, ordered residents to “shelter in place”. A lot of businesses shut down, but my line of work was not affected, as we are considered “essential”. The first two weeks of the “SIP” weren’t that bad, as I didn’t lose any of my employees; but as soon as the government announced the extra $600 weekly stimulus check to those who file for unemployment, I lost almost half of my department. They all of a sudden fear for their lives. Maybe they really do. I don’t know.

We have ample PPE resources and practice aseptic technique in everything we do. And we’re not even cooped up in a small place, as we have implemented our own measures to ensure compliance with social distancing.

But heck, the unemployment agency made it so easy for everyone to file  — no need to worry about the reason  — regardless of whether you’re genuinely fearful for your safety or you’re just plain lazy. I think for most of those who filed, it’s more of the latter.

Regardless of the social and political currents pushing people into lucrative unemployment, the workload in our "essential" industry didn’t decrease; ironically, while the political posturers and corporate marketing teams showered our industry with praise and gratitude, the policies and fear they've engendered have negatively impacted our operations, the manufacturing and supply chains upon which patients worldwide depend.

From here, I became irritated by America’s response to COVID-19. The government’s response affected not just the businesses across America, but every single living creature, both big and small. We were prohibited from the outside world, our outlet to release our stress and to get some breathing room. The government flexed its muscles in imposing rules (or unlawful mandates) to "prevent" the spread of a widely-misunderstood virus, such as social distancing, proper hygienic practices, and just sheltering in place. Americans, comfortably at home with YouTube, Netflix and Amazon at their disposal, were on the road to becoming the next Bobby Flay or Rachel Ray, happily forgiving their overlords for their tyrannical transgressions as they relished the unexpected stay-at-home vacation. Americans normalized what the government asked, or rather mandated, us to do. Americans were so compliant for almost four months that they supposedly helped in “flattening the curve”. We were so compliant that the government was going to “reward” us by opening the country again at the beginning of June. Then boom! George Floyd.

When I saw the video, I didn’t see it as racial profiling. Again, I am neither white nor black. But I am a "minority"  — an Asian woman, a mother, a registered voter (whatever that means), a worker, a non-politician. I saw an officer who seemed to have some sort of power trip and was probably showing off to his other buddies that he could pin down and tackle George Floyd with no help. These officers were not all white. They were a mix of different ethnicities, including a Hispanic, an African-American, and an Asian  — a Hmong, to be exact. Seldom has there ever been a more diverse group.

While I am not an expert on any of these, if a person is telling an officer he can’t breathe or you’re hurting him, given that you have three other officers on your side, I don’t think it’s that difficult to just loosen your stance a little. So what I saw in the video is a good example of police brutality, yet it’s not purely because George Floyd was black, and it's not because he didn't give those officers a reason to stop him. Did he deserve to die? Of course not. But the same rings true for Kelly Thomas and Tony Timpa, "white" victims of police brutality whose stories failed to gain the traction of their "black" counterparts.

Moving on to the protests that are happening. I’m not sure how to go about it. It frightens me more than the COVID-19. These protests brought out the good and evil among us. These protests enabled the criminals and those with criminal minds to finally get out of SIP and cause riots! These protests unleashed those who’ve been idle for almost four months to wreak havoc on our ailing communities! These protests unleashed hormonal teenagers from being locked up with their parents! Combining all of them, we are now witnessing the messiest, deadliest, and most confusing protest ever witnessed in my lifetime as an American. Of course, black lives matter, but so do the innocent lives that are being affected by the protests. It seems as though the bigger problem, which is police brutality, is now being overlooked here. If it were the Asian officer who knelt on George Floyd, would there be a protest like this? If it were the African-American officer, would there be a protest against him? I suspect not, given the muted voices of those in the aftermath of the cases of Thomas and Timpa.


When I see signs that include the word race or black or any color, it truly makes me question the real intent of it. Are we really trying to end the problem, or are we increasing the gap between the two most prominent "colors" in this country? Are we killing the specter of “white supremacy” or are we replacing it with “black supremacy”? Where's the "justice" in that? And at what cost are we to seek it? How many flesh-and-blood human beings — black, white or whatever — must die to have this form of "justice"?


Given the fact that my close "black" friends are just as fearful of the protests and the riots, and given the ethnicities of the murder victims during the riots and the lack of any coherent argument on the side of the so-called "movement", I doubt that "justice" is even remotely on the minds of these protestors; rather, they are after vengeance and retribution for what they've been led to believe is "injustice" against them. Just as with the lazy workers who prefer a paycheck for doing nothing, the looters and the protestors are opportunists eager to justify theft and their dissatisfaction with their stations in life, leaving others just to participate for the fun or intrigue of it all, to post their pictures on Instagram and Snapchat to convince themselves and their friends that they're hip and sensitive to the issues. Little do they know that the "issues" as they see them have been framed to keep them from appreciating the bigger picture.


Social media is plainly disgusting, and those who keep on switching from one hashtag to another, such as #stayhomesavelives or #blacklivesmatter or #alllivesmatter, what’s your real agenda? To stay home and save lives or to stay out and protest?


Don’t you ever wonder why everything that is happening right now is politically related? In a few months, we are electing a new “leader” to preside over this country. In a few months, new issues will arise. This country is crumbling because almost everyone is becoming emotionally involved and hypersensitive with every issue with which he or she can relate.


I am only concerned with the things that I can control, such as my own little family and our safety. I am in an interracial marriage, but I never see ourselves in color.


I’m going to be honest and say that I do have biased feelings towards "black" people, because of two unfortunate encounters with them. First, I was mugged at gunpoint by two black teenagers in front of my own home. Secondly, I was a victim of a hit-and-run vehicular accident, where a black woman aggressively swerved into my lane, causing my vehicle to be totaled. I’d say those two are the scariest events of my life. I feel that I will always be an easy target because I am a petite Asian woman. I don’t hate blacks, but I hate the circumstances in which they place themselves, which basically trickle down to the next person they tend to encounter, partially because they refuse to assume personal responsibility and instead prefer to interpret every event and misfortune through a colored lens.

Despite these feelings, some of my very best friends would be classified as "black" by their contemporaries, although they prefer to identify with their native countries in East Africa. They too are fearful of the riots and the protests, as they understand the thoughtlessness and emotional whirlwinds driving them to loot businesses and murder their neighbors, among them the very people whom the protests claim to support. They too see the danger of "black" people arming themselves with hatred at the sacrifice of truth, patience and understanding. In my daily life, where I rejoice in love and friendship within my own diverse social circle, I find those to be the virtues and the common bonds that bring us together. For this, I find that protests, riots and ill-conceived "movements" succeed only in pulling us apart, especially where they are founded upon notions that deliberately distract from them.

Signed,

Your fellow American

Comments

  1. I am encouraged by your honest perspective in the midst of the loud aggressive chant of the mob, repeating it's one sided and dishonest political narrative. Although bullies would have it that no other voice be heard, your little voice has been heard, because it is the truth that sets one free.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

Summarizing the “Separation of Church and State”

There is much confusion surrounding the concept of the “separation of church and state”; much of it likely born out of the steep secular decline in religious affiliation across recent generations, with particular emphasis among atheists and anti-deists.  While many have hastened to leverage this language (“separation of church and state”) in order to condemn or censure religious values — particularly those which are Christian — where they have carried influence in public life (i.e. prayer in schools, teachers covering lessons from the Bible, government representatives appealing to God, coinage bearing the words “In God We Trust”), the truth is that this “separation” was never expected to completely eliminate religious practice or religious sentiment from all matter of public life. In fact, religion was so deeply enmeshed in American life during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that the French magistrate and prison reformer Gustave de Beaumont, during his nine-month tour of A...

Rethinking “Forgiveness”

Forgiveness is often hailed as the ultimate moral virtue — a cleansing of the soul, a sign of spiritual maturity, and the first step toward healing fractured relationships. But in modern discourse, particularly in religious and pop-psychological circles, “forgiveness” has extended beyond the sensible, beyond etiquette, and beyond justice and useful application. The concept of “forgiveness” has been stretched far outside of the realms of that which is easy to “forgive”, that which is merely inconvenient or annoying, or relatively innocuous or insignificant, where “forgiveness” is merely part of tolerating people’s human shortcomings, their mistakes and  their accidents , or extending ‘mercy’ to those who’ve disrespected or “trespassed against us” (and have since offered sincere apologies and the necessary restitution). This reimagined kind of “forgiveness” has taken on a dangerously idealized form ignorant to or dismissive of the laws and limits of human nature and the potential imp...

Their Lives, Their Fortunes, and Their Sacred Honor

A  recent YouTube post by the political organization PragerU betrays the truth about the American Revolution. It goes as follows: “Britain spent a fortune defending the colonies in the French & Indian War. America’s response? Boycotts, protests, rebellion. Ingratitude that sparked a revolution.” This description of history is not just a reductive reframing of the issues; it is a crude and provocative statement insulting the intelligence of Americans who remember their history and disrespecting the men who staked everything in their noblest of causes during the American Revolution.  One commenter in the comments section even sided with PragerU, taking to task any who dares criticize the post: “Are you incapable of creating scenarios from the opposite side?” Unfortunately for this commenter, true history isn’t about “creating scenarios”; it’s about understanding what actually happened — the totality of the circumstances. So, let us do just that: let’s get straight to the fac...

Cullen Roche's Not So "Pragmatic Capitalism"

In his riveting new work Pragmatic Capitalism , Cullen Roche, founder of Orcam Financial Group, a San Diego-based financial firm, sets out to correct the mainstream schools of economic thought, focusing on  Keynesians, Monetarists, and Austrians alike. This new macroeconomic perspective claims to reveal What Every Investor Needs to Know About Money and Finance . Indeed, Roche introduces the layman to various elementary principles of economics and financial markets, revealing in early chapters the failed state of the average hedge fund and mutual fund operators  —  who are better car salesmen than financial pundits, Roche writes  —   who have fallen victim to the groupthink phenomenon, responsible for their nearly perfect positive correlation to the major indexes; and thus, accounting for tax, inflation, and service adjustments, holistically wiping out any value added by their professed market insight.  Roche also references popular stu...

The ‘Values’ Problem in the NFL

Every year, there is talk across the major sports leagues about which players are due for contract extensions and huge paydays. The chatter is seemingly endless, and it often seems to cast a shadow over the sports themselves — talking heads arguing and debating, insisting that so-and-so is going to ‘reset the market’ or so-and-so is demanding the ‘market rate’ for his position.  This is where the conversation goes awry, economically speaking.  The truth is that players  are not commodities: they are neither fungible nor interchangeable. Each player brings a distinct skill set, and each team operates within a unique scheme, meaning that each player’s value is situational rather than universal. There is, thus, no ‘market rate’ for any player or position; contracts exist in relation to each team’s particular situation, and every dollar spent on one player (in a salary-cap league) directly reduces the resources available for others — where ‘overspending’ in any case necessari...

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...

Death By Cop

A  recent post from a popular YouTube channel has provided more evidence of that which is blatantly obvious in modern America, at least to those who are willing to face the truth: the fact that cops, as with the governments they serve, are the enemy to goodness, justice, and American liberty.  This latest post is from The Civil Rights Lawyer, a channel (by a practicing civil rights lawyer) documenting police misconduct and civil rights violations since the year 2020. This time, it is a case of an elderly man, a former pastor suffering from dementia, murdered at the hands of “ the very people who were supposed to protect and care for him”: “Officers were dispatched to a business to assist an elderly customer who appeared to be suffering from dementia. At the scene, officers found him extremely confused. He told them the year was 1948 and that the president was George Washington. So they call his daughter to come pick him up. So how did things go so terribly wrong that day, tha...

The People's Banner: Why the “Thin Blue Line” Flag Betrays the Spirit of the Stars and Stripes

The American flag — proudly known as the Stars and Stripes — is more than a banner of colors stitched together. It is a living symbol of rebellion, unity, and the sovereignty of the people. It was never originally the flag of a government, but of a movement; not a mark of officialdom, but of revolution.  Having evolved from the Continental Union Flag, its stripes — with their roots in the "rebellious stripes" of the Sons of Liberty — represent resistance to abusive power, a stand against imperial overreach, and a declaration that legitimate authority flows from the consent of the governed. In this light, the proliferation of the “Thin Blue Line” version of the American flag is not merely a modification of a unique American symbol; it is a mutilation of the flag’s fabric and its meaning. It transforms a people’s flag into a government’s flag, in direct contradiction to its foundational ethos. The Stars and Stripes emerged during the crucible of the American Revolution. Designe...

“Stolen Land”

The claim that America was built on “stolen land” is not only a politically-loaded oversimplification, but a deliberately narrow framing that keeps America — and America alone — under perpetual moral scrutiny. It collapses fundamentally different actors, motives, and historical processes into a single accusation, thereby obscuring more than it explains. At a macro political level, land claims have  always  been in flux. Long before European contact, tribes across North America routinely warred over territory, resources, hunting grounds, and waterways. Claims were seasonal, contingent, and often overlapping, shaped by migration patterns, environmental conditions, and intertribal treaties that themselves shifted over time.  Had Europeans never settled in America, this dynamic would have continued to dominate; it was the prevailing condition of the continent. From this perspective, “ownership” has never been an abstract moral constant but a function of enforceability under a...