Skip to main content

America's Illogical Idolization of the Bush Family

Today marks the end of the life of Barbara Bush, who served as First Lady of the United States between 1989 and 1993. 

While 151,600 individuals die each day across the globe, Americans will pause to collectively grieve the loss of this one woman whom they've never met, much less ever had the chance to know at a more-than-academic level. 

And the total of this mourning across the nation will represent a manifestly glorified adoration for a family which symbolizes fantasy and concocted imagination far more than any strict rendering of historical happenings. 



Despite the horrendous implications of the Iran-Contra scandal, the devastating casualties of Iran Air Flight 655, and a set of monetary, fiscal and social policies which unequivocally conflict with the original thousand-points-of-light Bush campaign, a great many Americans remain enamored with the family which appears nearly immune to reproach and primly primed for induction into the immutable annals of whitewashed history.

It is astounding, really, to visualize the numbers of innocent civilians who have been murdered, the many trillions of dollars which have been squandered, and the untold measures of freedom which have been encroached upon by the Bush family, as they inconceivably continue to retain a margin of popularity among those who remain nostalgic about times past. 

Regardless of diabolical covert-ops, deceitful coverups, contradictory tax hikes, unconstitutional foreign engagements, unjustified expansions of the role of government, and fabricated pretexts to war, the Bush family has consistently, albeit cunningly, betrayed the U.S. Constitution and the American public while maintaining a semblance of royalty in the minds of many. 

Even against its own rubric, for which Mrs. Bush and her husband will be celebrated, the Bush family has indisputably failed the United States. 

In her husband's 1990 State of the Union Address, George H. W. Bush famously declared his objective to propel the United States to the forefront as "first in the world" in the subjects of math and science by the year 2000. 

While the United States has indeed dramatically increased its expenditures within the domain of education, and while high school graduation rates have climbed along with rates of college attendance, the average scores of American students have fallen far short of number one in the categories of math and science. 

In fact, the United States ranks 25th in science, six-tenths of a percent above the OECD average, and a mind-numbing 40th in mathematics, a full 4 percent below the OECD average.

It appears, then, that while no child has been left behind, a political fixture of son George W.'s later presidential platform, every child has been doomed to mediocrity or worse.  

It appears also that so many of us have been duped by our unflinching desire to view the world through rose-colored lenses, whereby we sedate ourselves through the palatable interpretation of sanguine translations. 

We perform this function, as mere human beings, to unconsciously operate toward a state of normality, or that of equilibrium, in order to protect ourselves from any threats which jeopardize our routine or our expectations; for as human beings, peace and stability prove mere functions of the regular satisfaction thereof, as the general direction for humanity is nowhere near the pursuit of truth or vivid understanding, but rather toward one’s own personal version of peace. 

And though a sophisticated foray into the frontiers of lesser-read histories would invariably expose the weaknesses of those expedient assumptions about the commonly-venerated tale, the commoner among us tends all too often to rest his conclusions on the warm and pillowy testimonies of those who are best versed in marketing powerful propaganda or the digestible short-hand storyline over the illumination of the objectionable truth which serves inconveniently to rattle our minds and leave us stranded between omniscience and desperation, where there is clearly not a whole lot of company.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

From BC to AD to AI

Artificial intelligence is bound not only to render the ordinary human being boring by comparison, and in many cases practically unnecessary, but to dispose human beings to hostility toward each other where any dares pose a question or raise a concern instead of taking it up with a chatbot (or AI interface); such a course of action eventually assuming such a regular place in human affairs as to stand in entirely for human discourse and daily interaction.  This is not only a very real possibility when considering the future course of human ‘civilization’; it is more than likely imminent or already upon us.  It is left to be seen just what this will look like, just how this will play out, just what tolerance the species (and even beyond) has for such extremes which this technology is to bring about. Likewise, it remains to be seen whether a heavily-indebted society facing never-ending and unavoidable taxes (i.e. taxes on property) can even be expected to retrain and retool for t...