Skip to main content

What's Powering the Dow?

What's powering the Dow?

With the DJIA closing at an all-time closing-bell high of 21,637.74, much fanfare surrounds the markets and the potential for Dow 30,000!

Is all the hype justified? And what does all of this mean to the average investor seeking returns for retirement?

This article points out the perils of U.S. equities and the real character and quality of the perceived boom.

The Dow tracks the price-weighted average of 30 large publicly-owned companies traded on the NASDAQ or NYSE. The index includes the likes of McDonald's, Boeing, American Express, IBM, Apple, Visa, Walmart, Microsoft and Nike, among others.

Along with the NASDAQ Composite and S&P 500, the DJIA functions as one of the major stock indices in the United States, representing the major moves of the trading day.

When first published in 1885, the Dow posted 62.76, peaking at 78.38 during the summer of 1890.

Even as early as 1987, the Dow peaked just above 2,700 before falling 508 points to 1,738 on Black Monday.

Today, the Dow is measured in the tens of thousands, stirring conversation around the possibility of Dow 30,000 during Trump's first term.

Of course, the figures are completely meaningless unless controlled for their comparative real values to reflect how much the index is worth in terms of the goods investors actually buy.

The following graphic depicts the gold-denominated price of the Dow Jones since 1995.

When measured against gold, the Dow is shown to have peaked at roughly 42 ounces in 1999, before the famed bursting of the information-technology bubble would eventually usher in the secular decade-long real bear market in stocks, rebounding only modestly since 2011, when gold eclipsed $1,900 per ounce.


The gold-denominated price of the Dow today rests even below the real high of 1965, when the index was worth 28 ounces of gold, compared to a current ratio of 17:1.

It would later crash in 1974 to the level of 3 ounces to then rebound to 9 ounces in 1976 before plummeting to a single ounce of gold by 1980, at the end of a decade which witnessed the US dollar lose two-thirds of its purchasing power and Volcker's eventual interest rate hike north of 20% to remedy the out-of-control inflation which originally monetized the massive Cold War-era military industrial complex, the attending arms and space races, the nominally-popular war on poverty and the innumerable dependency programs spawning from the Great Society movement and Roosevelt's New Deal. 


This would prove America's final bout of sanity as it would thereafter embark upon a decades-long war against the US dollar in a deliberate attempt to encourage debt and consumer spending over saving by incrementally driving down interest rates, guaranteeing or purchasing loans and debt-financing consumer behavior.

All of this was delivered at the continued expense of the US dollar, which would prove to lose an additional two-thirds of its value between 1980 and 2017, sacrificing at least one-third of its purchasing power between 1999 and today in the federal government's pursuit of engineering the wealth effect by way of buoying the asset classes of real estate and U.S. equities through the developed secondary mortgage market, artificially-low rates of interest and its practice of quantitative easing, the high-volume monthly purchase of US Treasury bills and mortgage-backed securities.


None of these crafty financial techniques has done anything to promote the actual production of valuable revenue-generating capital, as business investment has dwindled as a share of total gross domestic product, making way for increasingly greater sums of government spending and debt-financed consumption to comprise a metric which is more accurately characterized as gross domestic fantasy

Instead, the United States has only taken on increasingly more short-term debt to finance the $2.5-trillion-per-year dependency system, the indefinite metaphorical War on Terror, the post-financial crisis bailouts, and the ballooning bubbles in real estate, student loans, auto loans, and consumer credit, the latter series of which has emerged to complement mortgage debt in eclipsing the debt-level heights of 2008. 

The only difference is that the quality of current debt is inferior to the '08 variety, as mortgage debt has since yielded to a greater volume of auto loans, student loans and credit card debt that achieve nothing in the way of building equity. 

And yet we appear to be partying as if it's 1999, as the DJIA-to-GDP ratio today nears its pre-dot-com-collapse high. Meanwhile, record-low interest rates and record-high levels of margin debt and stock buybacks continue to fill the punch bowl with still further forms of unproductive, non-value-producing investment chasing returns on the Yellen put.



Meanwhile, Average US GDP growth across the most recent decade matches that of the 1930s, in the midst of the Great Depression, all while the personal savings rate has tumbled to 3% and the U.S. Dollar Index has fallen below the 93 level, marking a full 10-percent year-to-date loss. The last time the savings rate was this low, the United States was officially entering recession.

And as it turns out, the benefits of a booming stock market are heavily tilted toward the segments of the population that possess the excess capital to bid on the rally known today as the Yellen put

In fact, according to the Federal Reserve and several surveys conducted by Gallup and Bankrate, roughly half of the American population has nothing invested in the stock market. 

Meanwhile, approximately 10% of families own greater than 91% of all outstanding shares in a market environment wherein the gold-denominated Dow is worth roughly 60% less than its 1999 peak. 


So while the Dow Jones Industrial Average has put on a spectacular show in nominal terms over the past several months, imbued by the frothy and ambivalent confidence of a Trump rally rooted in grandiose and ill-understood expectations, the long-term trend illustrates the real character and quality of what has only masqueraded as a secular bull market since 2009. 

In the end, it's not the zeros that matter, but rather the goods and services you can buy with them. 

Comments

  1. I think I'll just invest in US Treasury bonds. They put out 2.75% interest over 30 years!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Deal with Tariffs

Over the course of President Trump’s two terms, there has been much talk around the matter of tariffs — taxes on imported goods. However, much of the talk seems to miss the point. After all, for those of us who seek the truth, it’s not really a question of whether tariffs are ‘good’ but whether they are preferable to other kinds of taxes — assuming, of course, that taxes are the rule, as certain as the eventuality of death. First, let’s establish the theory: beyond the generic purpose of revenue generation for the state, the institution of tariffs ordinarily serves to  reduce (or discourage) imports by making them artificially more expensive, while encouraging domestic production by making domestic products more appealing on a relative price basis. In the realm of foreign affairs, tariffs are instituted or threatened in the course of international trade negotiations in order to signal dissatisfaction with existing trade barriers and to push for more favorable trade terms; or in ord...

Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin)

Buy your copy today of  Fischer: Tortured in the Pasadena Jailhouse (featuring the Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin) , available at  Amazon  and Barnes & Noble . The name Bobby Fischer reigns supreme in the world of chess, yet there was a time when it hogged headlines, struck fear into the eyes of the competition, and was on the lips of folks all across the globe. More than the face of the centuries-old game, there was a time when Bobby Fischer was synonymous with the cause and spirit of America, that his moves on the chessboard sought more than checkmate but to pit the strength of “raw-boned American individualism” against “the Soviet megalithic system” which had come to dominate the game of chess at the same time it dominated Cold War politics. Fischer’s triumph over the USSR's Boris Spassky in the ’72 World Chess Championship would ultimately be celebrated as a symbolic and diplomatic victory for the U.S., but, as time would tell, it would not mean the American...

The Cost of Government is What It Spends, Not What It Taxes

The cost of government is the quantity it spends, not the quantity it taxes; that cost representing the financial burden imposed upon those who pay the taxes and all who transact within that economy or through its common currency. Likewise, governments can either take the people’s money through taxation or they can take the people’s purchasing power through money-printing (or the like).  Therefore, the argument against tax cuts requires further context to appreciate why tax cuts have failed and will continue to fail to deliver economic growth, especially where those tax cuts promote or serve excess indulgence and cheap speculation. In short, it’s not that tax cuts are inherently destructive, or that reducing the tax liability of the wealthiest in society “doesn’t work”; rather, the fact is that the public debt is so high that the country simply cannot afford those tax cuts without defaulting on its debts or — which is the same — covering them through inflation (i.e. money-printing,...